If everyone showed up and voted...

(10.) THEY SAY THE OLD WORLD IS SUCKING, SUCKING IN IT’S LAST BREATH. YOU CAN HEAR IT'S DEATH GURGLE IN THOSE EXPRESSING FEAR ABOUT WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF EVERYBODY EXHALED AND SHOWED UP TO VOTE.”

STIMULUS CHECK INFO...

https://feeds.aarp.org/politics-society/advocacy/info-2020/coronavirus-stimulus-checks.html?_amp=true

WHO'S MONEY IS IT?

Tax payers continuously foot the bail out bill, behind questionable executive business practices, fact of the matter is, many business leaders lack the acumen and skill-set of other top flight CEO enities!

Moreover, one just might not be the caliber of individual to be thrust at the helm, they could be in over their head or maybe the company is in the wrong industry?

But why should the American tax payer have to bear this burden?

Further more, the American tax payer doesn't get the stimulus they deserve. So this directive is geared to bringing attention to this flaw in tax cut, tax code, and stimulus legislative matters.

After all, we must never forget the tax payer is at the forefront, and the back-bone, of any perceived stimulus, or government bail out measure! And yes, the tax payer should receive the [lion-share]in all legislative quorums, concerning the distribution of tax revenue.

BENIGN NEGLECT...

While most of us are not pandemic or medical expert, we do recognize, in this chemical warfare, the need for Military Medical asistance concerning vital equipment namely ventilators, scrubs, gloves, footies, surgical masks and all else that might facilitate and help keep medical centers well stocked, in readiness for the current epidemic!

Why covid-19 is not classified as chemical warfare can only be described as ineptness, even naive!

Military leaders have marching orders and stepping out of line could have consequences, however who'd court marshall or really come after the top brass in a situation of obvious incompetence, for moving forward and deploying Medical units to head off further needless death in American cities and states.

The fact of the matter is, the Military leaders, never had bones spurs like their leader, so I'd be the first to say, they are his Superiors and like world leaders have been portrayed, they'd laugh at or mimic his incompetence militarily, but he hasn't even mentioned the mighty Military option, it's like benign neglect or he's just plain old naive!

ON TO THEM...

ON TO THEM... I won't let them turn me against Louis Farrakhan, because I know they hate our black leaders, with a purple passion and their nefarious thoughts I be trashin!

He's also not, anti-Semitic that is the biggest lie Ever Told about Mr Farrakhan, fact of the matter is, truth about them hurts!
And Mr. Farrakhan like so many other like-minded individuals, is on to them!

VIRAL VITAL RESISTANCE...

How awesome would it be, if thousands upon thousands, converged on Washington DC, with physical whistles or down loaded, whistle sound app, for the next viral, vital Resistance, March on Washington, in support of The Impeachment Inquiry, and whistleblowers everywhere?

UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME...

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/09/a-basic-income-could-boost-the-us-economy-by-2-5-trillion?utm_content=buffer2c560&utm_medium=social&utm_source=plus.google.com&utm_campaign=buffer&_utm_source=1-2-2

A monthly check of $1,000 delivered to every American adult, would grow the US economy by roughly $2.5 trillion over eight years, a new study found.

Conducted by the left-leaning Roosevelt Institute, the study investigated three strategies for implementing basic income, a form of wealth distribution that involves giving everyone a standard salary just for being alive.

Proponents of basic income say it would reduce or even eliminate poverty, while skeptics say it could erase people's motivations to keep working, possibly ruining the economy instead of improving it.

The three basic incomes proposed by the study were $1,000 paid monthly to every US adult; $500 paid monthly to every US adult; and $250 paid monthly to every US child. "For all three designs," a summary of the report said, "enacting a UBI and paying for it by increasing the federal debt would grow the economy."

Specifically, the study found that the largest of the three — $12,000 a year doled out to every American adult — would grow the economy by 12.6% to 13.1% over eight years, by which time the policy's effects would start to wane.
That would translate to an increase in gross domestic product of $2.5 trillion, according to data from the Congressional Budget Office.

The researchers made some assumptions in the study that could lead to such an optimistic conclusion.

Have you read?
Universal Basic Income is no magic bullet against poverty, finds OECD
15-hour weeks, basic income and doughnuts. Are these the big ideas that could end inequality?
Why we should all have a basic income!
The team's analysis was based on people continuing to work as if they weren't receiving a basic income, something skeptics have taken issue with.
Some believe that basic income, while not enough to live off, would disincentivize full-time work.

Some studies have found this not to be the case, but most have taken place in developing countries and have prompted skeptics to argue the results wouldn't necessarily translate to a richer, more populous country like the United States.
At least in the few basic-income experiments ongoing in the US, employment rates haven't seemed to change much.

The researchers also assumed basic income would solve a demand problem in the economy — i.e., a lack of people spending their money to buy things.
"Fundamentally, the larger the size of the UBI, the larger the increase in aggregate demand and thus the larger the resulting economy is," they wrote.

Other economic theories put less stock in that idea.
They argue that other costs — like interest rates on mortgages and credit cards — would rise.

The US is still far from a comprehensive basic-income plan. The biggest experiment in the world is set to begin this fall in Kenya. Operated by GiveDirectly, it involves 6,000 people, some of whom will receive a monthly payment every month for the next 12 years. The experiment will cost $30 million.

Smaller experiments have cropped up around the world over the past few years, including in California, Canada, Finland, and the Netherlands.
Other nations, such as India and Switzerland, have discussed experiments of their own in the coming years.

Until those experiments begin giving people money and analyzing the resulting data, however, economists will be left to speculate as to how transformative a basic income could really be.